PortfoliosLab logo
ENS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ENS and ^GSPC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ENS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EnerSys (ENS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ENS:

0.09

^GSPC:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

ENS:

0.42

^GSPC:

1.03

Omega Ratio

ENS:

1.05

^GSPC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

ENS:

0.14

^GSPC:

0.67

Martin Ratio

ENS:

0.34

^GSPC:

2.57

Ulcer Index

ENS:

11.97%

^GSPC:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

ENS:

32.40%

^GSPC:

19.67%

Max Drawdown

ENS:

-83.95%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

ENS:

-11.14%

^GSPC:

-4.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENS achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ENS has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 4.64%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


ENS

YTD

7.08%

1M

19.63%

6M

-0.89%

1Y

2.93%

5Y*

13.50%

10Y*

4.64%

^GSPC

YTD

-0.64%

1M

8.97%

6M

-2.62%

1Y

11.90%

5Y*

15.76%

10Y*

10.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ENS vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENS is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENS is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENS is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENS is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENS is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENS is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ENS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnerSys (ENS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ENS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ENS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENS drawdown since its inception was -83.95%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENS and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ENS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

EnerSys (ENS) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 6.29%. This indicates that ENS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...